Go Back   CityProfile.com Forum - Local City and State Discussion Forums > United States City Forums > California
Click Here to Login

Reply
Old 11-01-2010, 09:27 PM  
Junior Member

La Canada, CA
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6 | Kudos: +11
Quote:
I think it should be a federal thing, not just one state's decision.
I agree that the end (and ideal) goal is a repeal of marijuana prohibition at the federal level. However, there has been so much propaganda and stigma thrown on the marijuana issue that politicians are by and large afraid to even approach the issue since they perceive it as polarizing.

This is where Prop 19 steps in, not because it's going to put pot shops on every corner (I couldn't care less about that - I just want to be able to grow my own!), but because Prop 19 will help propel the debate on marijuana at the federal level. Just as California did with its medical Proposition 215, several states have followed suit and the department of justice has even made a public statement directing the DEA not to interfere with legitimate medical marijuana operations on the state level. Fast forward and here is Prop 19, which may hopefully have the same domino effect. It is not uncommon for California to lead the way with progressive legislation.

Small steps my friend, but steps nevertheless! Progress and change seem to come slowly in this day and age. But that is no reason to give up the good fight!
__________________

Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2010, 09:37 PM  
Senior Member
 
Jake7's Avatar

Honolulu, Hawaii
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,294 | Kudos: +135
Images: 45
"Stepping up the Obama administration's opposition to Proposition 19, the nation's top law enforcement official promised to "vigorously enforce" federal drug laws against Californians who grow or sell marijuana for recreational use even if voters pass the legalization measure.

U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric Holder's response to the initiative comes as the administration has been under pressure to campaign against it more forcefully. Last week, Mexico's president, Felipe Calderon, chided the Obama administration for not doing enough to defeat it. And last month, nine former heads of the Drug Enforcement Administration publicly urged Holder to speak out."



The Obama administration is pretty clearly against this, and they're all for enforcing federal law, just like they did when they raided tons of medical marijuana dispensories in California after that legislation passed.

Like I said, I'm not really for or against it, but I don't think it'll roll very well on the federal level, like you said.
__________________

__________________
Discover Scentsy at Lucky Lucy Scentsy Products - an independent Scentsy consultant!


https://luckylucy.scentsy.us/Scentsy/Buy
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2010, 09:37 PM  
Senior Member
 
Jake7's Avatar

Honolulu, Hawaii
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,294 | Kudos: +135
Images: 45
Holder vows fight over prop. 19 - Los Angeles Times

Oh that's from here, sorry
__________________
Discover Scentsy at Lucky Lucy Scentsy Products - an independent Scentsy consultant!


https://luckylucy.scentsy.us/Scentsy/Buy
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2010, 02:43 AM  
Senior Member

Anoka, Minnesota
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 101 | Kudos: +11
If I was in California I would vote Yes. Federal law prevents the drug from being there legally. So it would be a felony to have get it.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2010, 07:24 PM  
Junior Member

oakdale, ca
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9 | Kudos: +10
In a word NO!!!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2010, 11:41 PM  
Senior Member
 
havasu's Avatar

California
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,747 | Kudos: +238
Images: 17
I understand it is still early in the counting stages, but they have projected that Prop. 19 has gone up in smoke, and has been defeated by a rather large margin.

Sorry Cheech and Chong, maybe next time.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 03:13 PM  
Senior Member
 
Jake7's Avatar

Honolulu, Hawaii
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,294 | Kudos: +135
Images: 45
Failed.......
__________________
Discover Scentsy at Lucky Lucy Scentsy Products - an independent Scentsy consultant!


https://luckylucy.scentsy.us/Scentsy/Buy
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 02:05 AM  
Junior Member
 
TheBicyclingGuitarist's Avatar

Roseburg, Oregon
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5 | Kudos: +10
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake7 View Post
Failed.......
I just read that it garnered 46% of the vote. It was not an epic fail by any means. It did quite well considering this is one of the first if not the first time such a bill made it to the ballot.

Sooner or later, probably sooner, more people are going to realize that it is wrong to keep marijuana illegal. While recreational substances such as alcohol and tobacco have virtually no redeeming qualities, marijuana in some cases can actually be good for you. Besides that, prohibition does not work and is a waste of government money and police resources. Consider that instead of spending millions prosecuting people for what shouldn't be a crime in the first place, states could tax it and MAKE money, and that legalizing pot would take power away from criminal organizations, and it makes more and more sense that eventually this will happen.
__________________
?When you ride over sharps, you get flats!?―The Bicycling Guitarist, May 13, 2008
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 10:15 AM  
Senior Member
 
havasu's Avatar

California
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,747 | Kudos: +238
Images: 17
I understand your desire to pass the marijuana legalization, but there are too many misconceptions tied to this. Marijuana has already been decriminalized to a point that it is only an infraction to possess one ounce or less of pot. It takes a trained officer about 2 minutes to scratch a citation, and he is done. There is no prison sentence, there is no arrests made, and there are no millions spent. If the offender has a card signed by a doctor, the offender walks away with no ticket.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 10:33 AM  
Junior Member

Elgin, Illinois
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 14 | Kudos: +10
but still, it will probably be put on the 2012 ballot and others and will eventually pass.

Next, other states will follow their example and eventually the Federal government will get the idea.

Change takes time, especially something like this.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   CityProfile.com Forum - Local City and State Discussion Forums > United States City Forums > California
Bookmark this Page!

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Suggested Threads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.