Originally Posted by flaja
Feminists tell us that rape is a crime of violence, not a crime of sex.
But only a fool would believes that the crime of rape does not have a sexual component.
If a woman with no morals dresses like she is easy, how is a man with no morals supposed to know she isn?t easy?
Being easy and being raped are not the same thing. The fact that you seem to make no moral differentiation is disturbing.
Originally Posted by YelloJeep
I see it like this. A lady dressing provocatively walking down the street at 2:00AM in a sort of seedy part of town by herself is placing herself at risk.
The same way that if I park a nice car with a nice laptop sitting on the passenger seat with the window cracked open a little in a bad part of town overnight is taking a risk.
Would it be wrong of someone to break into the car?? Of course! Should I feel that I was irresponsible? Yes. I think these are comparable situations.
So then crime is permissible as long as the victim is asking for it?
Originally Posted by RedJeepXJ
standards vary, in some cultures a women just wearing shorts and a t-shirt would be extremely revealing.... people should be able to dress however they want including beachwear or even be nudists without someone saying their clothes or lack their of justifies their being raped......
This is just another old religious zealot pushing his agenda of right and wrong
Yup. I'm surprised we haven't seen a " Stop teaching women to read" thread.
Originally Posted by flaja
The issue isn?t so much whether or not rape is justified as it is whether or not a rape actually happened.
Our current feminist-dominated society is pre-disposed to see every man as a predator so it is extremely difficult for a non-rapist to prove his innocence. But at the same time we have a lot of women that are willing to let themselves be prey so it is extremely difficult to prove that a rapist is in fact guilty.
Back when most women had morals and no woman had birth control pills most men also had morals because the more a man slept around the easier it was for him to be hauled into church by an angry father or hauled into court on a rape charge or simply shot by a jilted husband.
But now it is easy for any man to sleep around because so many women are willing to be slept around with. Any rapist can simply say the sex was consensual. And if the woman has been beaten half to death in the process the man can simply say she likes rough sex.
Back when women had morals? When was this? Please give me a date.
You seem to have a skewed world perspective, and you remind me of someone I have debated many times.
Birth control is a problem?
Feminist dominated society?
Now it's easy?
Are you stuck in some sort of imaginary time vortex?