Go Back   CityProfile.com Forum - Local City and State Discussion Forums > General Discussion > National Politics / Debate
Click Here to Login

Reply
Old 09-20-2011, 02:47 PM  
Senior Member

Greenville, SC
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,141 | Kudos: +188
Are rich taxed less than secretaries?

Are rich taxed less than secretaries? - politics - White House - msnbc.com

WASHINGTON ? President Barack Obama makes it sound as if there are millionaires all over America paying taxes at lower rates than their secretaries.

"Middle-class families shouldn't pay higher taxes than millionaires and billionaires," Obama said Monday. "That's pretty straightforward. It's hard to argue against that."

The data tell a different story. On average, the wealthiest people in America pay a lot more taxes than the middle class or the poor, according to private and government data. They pay at a higher rate, and as a group, they contribute a much larger share of the overall taxes collected by the federal government.

There may be individual millionaires who pay taxes at rates lower than middle-income workers. In 2009, 1,470 households filed tax returns with incomes above $1 million yet paid no federal income tax, according to the Internal Revenue Service. That, however, was less than 1 percent of the nearly 237,000 returns with incomes above $1 million.................



I'm sure people around the country actually believe Obama's deceptions...
__________________

__________________
"A society that puts equality ... ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom."

--Milton Friedman (1912-2006)
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2011, 04:00 PM  
mohel
 
blucher's Avatar

Keizer, OR
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,383 | Kudos: +123
Images: 99
................





Quote:
The Poor Rich
Robert de Neufville on September 24, 2010, 6:47 PM

Yesterday I wrote that just about the only substantive thing the Republicans promise to do differently from Democrats in their recently released ?Pledge to America? is to extend the Bush tax cuts on income over $250,000 a year. They pledge to do this at the expense of balancing the budget and getting the deficit under control, which is ostensibly one of their top priorities. Balancing the budget may be more important to them than passing a food safety bill in the wake of the August recall of 500 million potentially salmonella-tainted eggs, but it?s not as important as lowering tax rates for the rich.

Of course, not everyone thinks that earning $250,000 a year makes you rich. Chicago law professor Todd Henderson complains that after he pays his property taxes, sends his three kids to private school, and pays people to mow his lawn, take care of his kids, and clean his house there?s not much money left. It?s true that?s it?s not that unusual in America for someone to make more than $250,000?millions of Americans do?but what Henderson is missing that most of us don?t have as large of a house as he does and can?t afford to send three kids to private school, much less hire people to do our household chores for us. $250,000 a year is more than five times what the median American household makes?and millions more Americans can't find work at all. For most of us the things Henderson considers necessities are fantastic luxuries.

Even so, it?s easy to understand why the rich wouldn?t want to have the government take a large percentage of their income. But taxes on the rich in the U.S. are actually low both compared to what they used to be or and compared to what they are in other wealthy countries. The effective federal tax rate on the top 1%?who make well over $250,000 a year?hovers around 30%, which is substantial, but hardly confiscatory. Because capital gains are taxed differently the richest Americans may pay a significantly lower rate. And before you feel too sorry for the rich, it?s worth remembering that they?ve been getting steadily richer relative to the rest of us for years.

The other thing to remember about the tax cuts for the wealthy that the Republicans have made their top priority is that they they don?t really affect people much who are making ?just? over $250,000 a year. As Annie Lowery points out, the taxes at stake are on income past the first $250,000 you make. If you make a dollar more than $250,000, they mean you would pay just 3 cents more than you would under the Republican plan. In other words, you would pay 3% more on the last dollar you made, but the effective tax rate on your entire income would change by just a fraction of a fraction of a percent. And Ezra Klein points out that the so-called ?tax cuts for the middle class? are actually tax cuts on all income up to $250,000, even for people who make more than that. In other words, even if we don?t extend the tax cuts on income over $250,000 a year, people who make more than $250,000 will still get a sizable break on their taxes. Moreover, Klein calculates that if we extend the tax cuts on income over $250,000, people making between $200,000 and $500,000 will get an average additional tax break of just $409, which amounts to a break of around 0.1% on effective tax rate. People making $500,000 a year would see their effective tax rates go down just 1.5%.

Tax cuts are always politically popular. But it is truly difficult to understand why the Republicans would increase the deficit and kill worthwhile health and infrastructure programs for a tax break like this?at least until you remember that most of the Republicans? campaign money is coming from the one group that really would benefit from the tax break: billionaires.
Are rich taxed less than secretaries?-11.4.jpg 

Are rich taxed less than secretaries?-2_oil_profits1.jpg 

Are rich taxed less than secretaries?-2nd-chance.jpg 

Are rich taxed less than secretaries?-mirror.jpg 

Are rich taxed less than secretaries?-mitch-mcconnell_boehner.jpg 

Are rich taxed less than secretaries?-national_debt.jpg 

Are rich taxed less than secretaries?-polls_rush_limbaugh.jpg 




__________________

__________________
I'll believe corporations are persons when Texas executes one.: LBJ's Ghost
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2011, 04:04 PM  
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,892 | Kudos: +92
Quote:
Originally Posted by YelloJeep View Post
Are rich taxed less than secretaries? - politics - White House - msnbc.com

WASHINGTON ? President Barack Obama makes it sound as if there are millionaires all over America paying taxes at lower rates than their secretaries.

"Middle-class families shouldn't pay higher taxes than millionaires and billionaires," Obama said Monday. "That's pretty straightforward. It's hard to argue against that."

The data tell a different story. On average, the wealthiest people in America pay a lot more taxes than the middle class or the poor, according to private and government data. They pay at a higher rate, and as a group, they contribute a much larger share of the overall taxes collected by the federal government.

There may be individual millionaires who pay taxes at rates lower than middle-income workers. In 2009, 1,470 households filed tax returns with incomes above $1 million yet paid no federal income tax, according to the Internal Revenue Service. That, however, was less than 1 percent of the nearly 237,000 returns with incomes above $1 million.................



I'm sure people around the country actually believe Obama's deceptions...
That's the sad thing many people actually believe that Obama has a plan to solve the debt problem.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   CityProfile.com Forum - Local City and State Discussion Forums > General Discussion > National Politics / Debate
Bookmark this Page!

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Suggested Threads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.